AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/009
Senior Consultant, Dept of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Professor, Duke NUS Graduate Medical School, Professor, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Director, SingHealth Duke NUS Institute of Medical Simulation (SIMS).
*Corresponding Author: Fatimah Lateef, Senior Consultant, Dept of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Professor, Duke NUS Graduate Medical School, Professor, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Director, SingHealth Duke NUS Institute o
Citation: F Lateef. (2020) It Just Takes One Phone Call: Simultaneous Activation to Reduce Referral Times. Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Care. 2(2); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/009
Copyright: ©2020 Fatimah Lateef, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 21 July 2020 | Accepted: 04 September 2020 | Published: 11 September 2020
Keywords: maternal emergencies; emergency department; simultaneous activation; insitu simulation; failure mode effect analysis
When there are maternal and neonatal emergencies in the Emergency Department, Emergency Physicians will manage them and will call on the Obstetrics and Gynaecology as well as Neonatalogy doctors and staff as needed. Thus far, these staff have to called individually and it takes time to repeat the history and relevant information to each one of them. We embarked on an initiative to have simultaneous activation of the relevant personnel once such emergencies surfaced. This would be through an agreed upon model and will be conducted via the operator and institution’s switchboard. All the relevant staff involved in the activation will get the information straight away, simultaneously and immediately upon activation.
To be able to do this, we organised several meetings and brainstorming sessions with the disciplines involved, tried out insitu simulation scenarios with failure mode effect analysis, as well as applied the PDSA cycle (Plan, Do, Study and Act) to the initiative. After the robust testing and discussions, which took some 6 months, the final pathway and algorithm for simultaneous activation and management was executed.
Singapore General Hospital is a tertiary referral centre and teaching institution. It is part of an Academic Medical Centre, together with Duke NUS Graduate Medical School on the same campus. There are 1800 beds spanning across 36 different specialties. The Emergency Department tends to some 140 000 patients annually. The institution also has a renown Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology (OG) and a Department of Neonatology, including a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. When there are maternal emergencies in the ED, frontline emergency physicians will manage them and can contact the OG doctors by calling the on-call doctor. The same goes for the neonatologist on call. The maternal emergencies would include maternal cardiac arrest, eclamptic seizures, antenatal and postnatal (post-partum haemorrhage) obstetric haemorrhage. At times, coupled with the maternal emergencies are obstetric emergencies such as shoulder dystocia, breech delivery, premature baby delivery and cord prolapse. For all these, the on call OG doctors would be contacted together with the neonatology registrar. [1,2] When the emergency is one which is likely to need surgery in the emergency operating theatre (eg. cord prolapse, massive post-partum haemorrhage), the anesthesiologist on call as well as the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) registrar would also have to be called, individually.
The time taken for these personnel to arrive at the ED resuscitation room varies due to a variety of factors, including how fast they could be contacted by the ED staff. Over the years, there have been feedback on some challenges and difficulties in the micro-system described above. These could be related to time delays, people/human factors, equipment issues and lack of clear workflow processes.[3] When there is no response based on the first phone call, the staff will have to try again until a response is obtained with confirmation to come down to the ED. During the phone-call, the staff who is calling would have to summarize the gist of the case and this would of course, take some time as well. This would have to be repeated for every person who is being contacted from the various disciplines involved in the care.
As a result of this, it was decided that a review and brainstorming of the work flow and processes was needed. This would be conducted with an inter-professional team, from all the relevant disciplines. A simple, clear and effective workflow would be desirable. Every discipline must be clear about their roles, responsibilities and commitment as members of the team. [3]
From the review, a consolidated algorithm was generated based on the agreement and inputs from all disciplines. This was attained after several rounds of brainstorming to ensure the needs and requests are all looked into.
Insitu Simulation and Healthcare Failure Mode Analysis
Our team decided that an insitu simulation would be one of the best ways to assess the algorithm, work processes and identify latent threats. In-situ simulation (ISS) is defined as Point Of Care simulation taking place in the actual clinical environment during the working shifts. It can be used to test overall preparedness and seamlessness with a particular workflow and/or a process. It promotes experiential learning, which is closely aligned to actual work experiences. [4-6]
The scenarios for the ISS were carefully selected to cover the range of maternal, obstetrics and neonatal emergencies in various combinations, to test and stress the workflow and micro-systems in place. These insitu simulation scenarios, usually commenced in the ED resuscitation room and will follow through into the labour ward, admitting ward or the emergency operating theatre, as appropriate [7, 8]. Some examples of the scenarios include, maternal cardiac arrest, premature labour, breech deliver, cord prolapse and eclamptic seizures.
In general, certain obstetric/ maternal emergencies are rare. The potential for legal liabilities makes dependence on learning at the bedside with real life events impractical and a potential threat to patient safety. Simulation is thus a viable alternative teaching strategy, both for learning new skills as well as maintaining these skills. Simulation will help prepare the team for the high risk and relatively rare events. The simulation also offers a safe environment to practice and make mistakes, learn from them and take the necessary corrective actions, in order to improve work flow processes and skills. [9]
In order to make this exercise as comprehensive as possible, it was decided to combine ISS with the concept of Healthcare Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA). The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) model in healthcare is a quality improvement tool which usually involves an inter-professional team assembled to identify systemic risks, using the steps as shown in (Table 1). [10, 11] FMEA is used prospectively to identify systemic failures which need to be addressed, with the overall system made more robust as a result. FMEA focuses on processes and not on a specific event. FMEA helps to pinpoint failure modes derived from expert opinion and statistical estimates, as opposed to an evaluation of a specific process under actual operating conditions. Thus, our plan to combine both ISS with FMEA was based on our goal of making the experience as practically oriented as possible. The drill utilizing ISS and FMEA will assist to ensure a more comprehensive and wholesome look at the processes, operations and logistics. It also helps to ensure that no tasks are redundant or omitted [10-12].
Active participation from the inter-professional teams during the ISS-FMEA before the actual implementation will facilitate the evaluation of critical points and the subsequent changes before the final application. These preliminary steps can help in the assessment of adequacy of the structure as well as prepare the staff from different departments for better compliance with the algorithm and protocols when implementation commences [3, 12].
In taking this approach, it may take a longer time to implement a new or updated protocol, but we feel this is a robust and unified approach. Moreover, it gives the inter-professional team a coordinated way to execute care, which is adequately researched and is evidence-based. The training conducted helped build and strengthen inter-professional relationships, as well as enhance the competencies for maternal and neonatal care. [13-16] Simulation-based training using ISS reinforces evidence-based practices, whilst improving communications and teamwork skills under realistic ED conditions [5, 9].
The Plan-Do-Study-(ReDo)-Act Cycle
Our model of approach for the proposed change is using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle (PDSA Cycle). This is a quality improvement methodology and tool which we felt can be readily and easily applied to our context in healthcare to help embrace and support our intent. Afterall, we want to have a delivery of care which is timely, safe, efficient and effective for our patients. The PDSA tool is relevant for us as it focuses on the crux of change and translation of ideas from our discussions and brainstorming session into executable actions. It would also enable us to incorporate new practices from our learning during ISS/ FMEA drills into the new model proposed. [17, 18] As healthcare is a complex environment, we felt there was sophistication in the simplicity of the PDSA model and extremely practical to apply. The model helped in our formulation of the hypothesis, collecting information and data as needed, analyzing and interpreting information and observations we had and finally, making the right inferences to execute the new, changed model of work [17, 19].
Steps involved in our PDSA Cycle
Plan:
Do:
Study:
Act:
Administrative Issues and Technical Testing
With finalization of the algorithm and workflow, a few other things needed to be sorted out. It was decided that the initiator of the flow, within the institution will be:
Any of the above staff will only need to pick up the telephone and dial “0” for the operator at switchboard. They then need to state clearly the relevant information. The message must include a one statement summary of the case and also the exact location. It is not good enough to state: “35 year old Gravida 1, Para 0, with cord prolapse at the ED”. It is better to state, “35 year old Gravida 1, Para 1, with cord prolapse at the ED Resus Room Panel 2”.
All the inter-professional personnel involved will be activated simultaneously by the operator and they will receive the message all at the same time on their mobile devices, registered with the institution.(20-22) Once the message is received they will then make their way promptly to the mentioned location [3].
All activation cases will be audited. Forms, either physical or electronic, will have to be completed.
Discussion
Hospitals represent complex, multi-faceted systems, with subdivisions into macro- and micro-systems. It is important to ensure well-coordinated services as well as continuity of essential services as patients move from one area to the next within the institution. There must be timely handling and swift adaptation to the changing needs and demands. This is especially so with critically ill patients, with time-dependent conditions. Planning and training will help to ensure effective use of resources, familiarity with workflow processes and efficient involvement of the right specialists at the right time [23]. Planning this simultaneous activation code took some 6 months, from the conceptualization phase, to setting the clear achievable objectives, meetings with relevant inter-professional colleagues, coordinating the ISS/ FMEA, reviewing and testing out the codes and fine-tuning the final algorithm to meet every discipline’s needs. (Table 2) All these steps are important to ensure we start off this code activation on a positive note, with buy-in from all parties. We plan to conduct debrief after each actual code activation and use this platform for a quality improvement project and intervention.
Conclusion
An innovative and collaborative approach to obstetric/ neonatal emergencies can make these episodes more manageable, in a timely fashion, with enhanced levels of patient safety and better outcomes. One of the key changes is our replacement of the sequential activation and calling process with the simultaneous activation of the team. This is indeed a major paradigm shift and a necessary one. Inter-professional team responses such as this must proceed in a coordinated and choreographed fashion to ensure efficiency and effectiveness in execution.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
